Dialogic ideation

One of the many approaches to design ideation takes the form of dialogue, or interactive communication between two or more designers, or between the designers, clients and users (co-design). The dialogue, or conversation, however, as an experience of human interaction, is rarely just a rational exchange of ideas. More often than not it involves the participants' attitudes, motivations and feelings when faced with, and responding to a given situation or problem as typically articulated in the design brief.. The dialogue, or exchange of first thoughts and ideas, then, creates and presents scenarios or narratives that triggers emotional responses in the stakeholders. Moreover, in AI-facilitated design, the dialogue highlights the role of designers to take responsibility and accept accountability for limiting any negative impact of AI, notably in terms of AI ethics. Additionally, the emotional content in what may called dialogic ideation, may act as a prologue to designing for emotion when, as in, say, product design, the user experience is core. 

When ideas run into the sand

When Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman proposed building a 110-mile linear megacity called the Line in the middle of the desert near the border of Jordan and Egypt in 2020—the centerpiece of a vast new planned city called Neom accommodating 9 million residents—a dozen of the world’s most prestigious architecture firms signed up. Now, five years later, the idea has run into the sand, literally, with the Saudi government having a change of heart announcing the $1.5 trillion project will be downscaled drastically. And so, the assigned architects are now working on redesigning the megastructure into a more modest, and radically changed project - from metropolis to a hub for data centers to serve the AI industry. The megacity idea, however, was, due to is complexity and construction costs, unrealistic from the start. More generally, expert analysis by Oxford University's Saïd Business School suggests megaprojects are often commissioned for the wrong reason ("unchecked  motivations") and, due to their size and complexity, are pre-determined to systemic failure. As for motivation, then, did big ego, including the architects', get in the way ("lack of ego-control")? If so, does the retreat of the megaproject exemplify design driven by hype rather than evidence-based practice. For example, Neom's presentation videos were a masterclass in rendering a seductive utopia. More contentious, the Saudi decision may reflect how the planning of Arab cities responds to globalism: That is, does "new Arab urbanism" differ significantly from colonialism, that is, the intrusion of a Western lifestyle? http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/20950/1/11.pdf